
11/24/09 – User fees make up a decreasing share of total funds spent on highways. "Non-user fees" are making up the difference. Read more »

11/06/09 – Long-term loan guarantees by the Export-Import Bank of the United States helped Boeing sell nearly $10 billion in airplanes abroad in fiscal years 2007 and 2008. Read more »

10/27/09 – Amtrak routes lost an average of $32 per passenger in 2008, four times higher than the loss calculated using Amtrak’s own figures.
See our analysis and Amtrak route map »

10/07/09 – A new database allows users to find details on nearly $18 billion in grants for almost 19,000 airport projects over the past five years. Search Grants »

09/28/09 – More than $45 billion in federal transportation spending during fiscal year 2008 went to programs that contain subsidies. Read more »

05/08/09 – Our interactive map explores the county-by-county geographic footprint of TARP recipients in terms of both assets and branches, and lets users compare that data to banks' lending activity.

04/08/09 – Keep tabs on the Fed's balance sheet, and see how it's ballooned during the bailout.
March 4, 2010 – Recent updates to the TARP subsidy estimates indicate that the previously projected cost of the program to the government for fiscal year 2009 has decreased to $152 billion. This is a significant reduction to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate from March 2009, when the long-term costs were expected to be $356 billion. That estimate represented a significant increase from CBO’s previous January 2009 estimate that the program would cost $189 for the FY 2009–2010 period.
Further, January 2010 CBO estimates show that the program will bring in revenue for FY 2010, and then cost the government an additional $16 billion from FY 2011–2020. Pew Economic Policy Group’s Doug Hamilton was quoted in a recent article discussing TARP estimates, in which he confirmed that the projections of TARP’s lifetime costs “are a lot lower than they were last year, mostly because the stock market values have improved so much.”
While TARP cost estimates have decreased considerably, CBO’s recent projections indicate that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will impose relatively large costs on the Treasury; the latest estimate for the costs of Fannie and Freddie total $176 billion for FY 2009-2020. Subsidyscope will be updating these and other bailout related information on its Web site soon.
December 3, 2009 – Finding detailed information on aviation, highway, transit, rail and maritime transportation spending by the federal government is easy using Subsidyscope.org.
Researchers, journalists and the general public are invited to search Subsidyscope's database of over 700,000 entries on federal transportation spending. All content on Subsidyscope is part of the public domain, meaning data can be freely used and cited in other analyses.
To learn more, see this tutorial by Subsidyscope Project Director Marcus Peacock, who explains how to search the transportation database using basic and advanced options. Watch the two-part screencast »
November 24, 2009 – The way American roads are funded is changing. Revenues that predominantly come from users of roads ("user fees") including fuel taxes, vehicle registration fees and tolls, pay for a decreasing share of road costs. Taxes and fees not directly related to highway use ("non-user fees") are making up the difference. The analysis shows that in recent years, these revenues are funding a greater share of highway construction and maintenance projects, with a corresponding decrease in the percentage of user contributions, thereby increasing the financial burden on "non-users."
Using Federal Highway Administration statistics, Subsidyscope has calculated that in 2007, 51 percent of the nation's $193 billion set aside for highway construction and maintenance was generated through user fees—down from 10 years earlier when user fees made up 61 percent of total spending on roads. The rest came from other sources, including revenue generated by income, sales and property taxes, as well as bond issues. Read more »
November 6, 2009 – The Boeing Co. was the biggest beneficiary of long-term loan guarantees by the Export-Import Bank of the United States in fiscal years 2007 and 2008, a Subsidyscope analysis shows. Of the $15.3 billion in guarantees issued by Ex-Im during the two-year period, nearly $10 billion, or 65 percent, went toward the purchase of commercial aircraft made by Chicago-based Boeing. Read more »
October 27, 2009 – Forty-one of Amtrak’s 44 routes lost money in 2008 with losses ranging from nearly $5 to $462 per passenger depending upon the line, according to analysis by Pew’s Subsidyscope.
The line with the highest per passenger subsidy—the Sunset Limited, which runs from New Orleans to Los Angeles—carried almost 72,000 passengers last year. The California Zephyr, which runs from Chicago to San Francisco, had the second-highest per passenger subsidy of $193 and carried nearly 353,000 passengers in 2008. Pew's analysis indicates that the average loss per passenger on all 44 of Amtrak’s lines was $32, about four times what the loss would be using Amtrak's figures: only $8 per passenger. Read more and view interactive Amtrak route map »
October 7, 2009 – Nearly $2 billion for more than 3,100 airport construction and rehabilitation projects has been obligated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) during the past five years even though the projects received low priority ratings, a Subsidyscope review of FAA data has found.
A searchable database released today on Subsidyscope includes National Priority Ratings (NPRs) for every project awarded a grant under the FAA’s Airport Improvement Program (AIP) from fiscal year 2005 through most of fiscal year 2009. Users may search by airport name, code or state, and sort findings by NPR (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher numbers being the highest-priority projects), congressional district or whether funding came through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Read more »
October 2, 2009 – In an unprecedented move this week, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is asking banks to prepay their quarterly fees for the next three years in order to stem steady losses to the fund that backs accounts when an insured bank or thrift fails. Read more »
September 28, 2009 – Even before the stimulus legislation passed, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) was on track to spend more than $71 billion in the fiscal year that ends September 30. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act gave the department another $48 billion to hand out, bringing the total to $119 billion. Transportation-related spending by agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security, and tax breaks for benefits like parking and transit passes, nudge the number even higher.
Where did all this money go? How much of it went toward subsidy programs? Today, Subsidyscope releases information and search functions to help taxpayers and policy makers answer these and other questions. We've collected data from USAspending.gov and other sources and built a searchable database of transportation spending; users can query by grant recipient, state, government program and many other parameters. We've gathered additional data from federal agencies that shed light on specific programs, many of which receive little public scrutiny. We've documented tax deductions that benefit corporations and individuals and cost the government billions of dollars each year, and insurance programs that could expose taxpayers to massive payouts in the event of a disaster.
Among our findings:
Subsidyscope, launched by The Pew Charitable Trusts, aims to raise public awareness about the role of federal subsidies in the economy. Read More »
Coming soon
Government Subsidies:
Revealing the Hidden BudgetUpdated 11/18/2009
Subsidyscope releases all of its data in open formats. Learn more.
Have a suggestion, question or concern? Let us know.
Enter a bank or holding company name to learn how much TARP funding an institution has received or whether it is participating in an FDIC debt guarantee program (TLGP).
Warrants in/out of money based on March 9, 2010 stock prices. Learn more about TARP warrants and track other institutions.
| Current Stock Price |
Strike Price |
In/Out of Money ($)* |
In/Out of Money (%)* |
|---|
| $16.80 | $30.79 | $-13.99 | -45% |
| $3.82 | $17.85 | $-14.03 | -79% |
| $28.98 | $34.01 | $-5.03 | -15% |
*In/Out of Money ($) is the stock price minus the strike price; In/Out of Money (%) is the difference in the stock price and strike price divided by the strike price. It is the percentage by which the stock price is above or below the strike price.
Subsidyscope is guided by a broad and bipartisan advisory board of top experts in federal spending, taxes, and finance. The Sunlight Foundation, Pew's research and technology partner, is developing the database and Web site to facilitate the distribution of data across the Web.